As the medical device industry faces increasingly stringent biocompatibility requirements, the ISO 10993 series of standards has become a key reference in product development and regulatory submissions. Among them, ISO 10993-23 specifically addresses irritation testing. Today, let’s explore the key content and practical strategies of this standard.
Irritation testing aims to evaluate whether the materials or products of a medical device may cause adverse reactions in the skin, eyes, or mucosal tissues. According to the ISO 10993-23 standard, the current testing methods include:
• Intracutaneous (Intraderma) Irritation Testing
• Primary Irritation Testing
• Tissue-Specific Irritation Testing (e.g., oral, ocular, vaginal)
• In Vitro Methods (Reconstructed Human Epidermis model - RhE)
Intracutaneous testing is a highly sensitive method suitable for most contact types of medical devices. It typically uses samples extracted according to ISO 10993-12.
⚠ Note: If the material is initially considered an irritant to the skin, eyes, or mucosal tissues, or if its pH is less than 2.0 or greater than 11.5, intracutaneous testing should be avoided. In such cases, comparison with similar approved products (predicate devices) or risk-benefit assessment in a De Novo or PMA submission should be considered.
Example: For dermal fillers intended for subcutaneous injection, direct injection testing may be conducted.
Also known as direct skin contact testing, this method applies to products that only contact intact skin, such as bandages and wound dressings. The method involves applying the sample or its extract directly to the skin of test animals.
Reminder: If the product is for prolonged contact (>24 hours), repeated exposure testing is recommended. Also, be mindful of the definition of “intact skin”—certain populations (e.g., elderly, infants, diabetics, or those with skin conditions) may have compromised barrier functions even without visible wounds.
Some products that come into direct contact with specific tissues, such as the eyes, mouth, or vagina, may require specific irritation testing, for example:
• Oral irritation: dental adhesives, mouthwashes, mouthguards
• Ocular irritation: contact lenses, ophthalmic implants
• Vaginal irritation: catheters, lubricants, condoms
These tests can often replace intracutaneous testing. However, if a product contacts multiple tissue types, both intracutaneous and tissue-specific tests may be required.
This emerging method does not rely on animal testing. However, it has not yet been officially recognized by the FDA as a standard testing approach for medical devices.
Suggestion: If a company wishes to avoid animal testing, it may submit a Pre-Submission to the FDA to discuss how to demonstrate the validity of such in vitro methods.
ISO 10993-23 is an essential part of biocompatibility evaluation for medical devices. Different types of products should select appropriate irritation testing methods based on actual contact type, duration of contact, and patient population.
24-hour online customer service at any time to respond, so that you worry!