EMC China Lab

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Testing of Medical Devices

Views :
Update time : 2024-04-23

In vitro cytotoxicity testing employs cell culture techniques to determine cellular responses such as cell death (e.g., cytolysis), growth inhibition, colony formation, and other effects on cells caused by medical devices, materials, or their extracts.

 

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Testing of Medical Devices(图1)


Within the biological evaluation system for medical devices, in vitro cytotoxicity testing stands as one of the most crucial indicators. Through cytotoxicity assessment, the potential in vitro cytotoxicity of medical devices and biomaterials can be evaluated. Serving as a simulated experiment prior to the use of tissues and cells in biological organisms, in vitro cytotoxicity testing plays a predictive role in assessing reaction outcomes. In vitro cytotoxicity testing methods are cost-effective, straightforward, and amenable to batch testing, providing essential screening materials for whether samples should proceed to animal laboratory experiments.

 

Evaluation Categories

Among the numerous methods utilized in in vitro cytotoxicity assays, evaluation categories can be divided based on measurement endpoints into the following:

 

1. Assessment of cell damage through morphological methods;

2. Measurement of cell damage;

3. Measurement of cell growth;

4. Measurement of specific aspects of cellular metabolism.

 

Solutions

SGS Laboratories possess extensive experience in cytotoxicity testing, offering comprehensive testing systems for medical devices and biomaterials cytotoxicity assessments. Testing methods for medical devices and biomaterials cytotoxicity typically fall into two main categories: quantitative cytotoxicity testing and qualitative cytotoxicity testing.

 

Quantitative Cytotoxicity Testing: MTT Assay

Principle

This test is based on observing cell metabolic activity. MTT is a yellow water-soluble reagent that is metabolized by viable cells into a purple formazan, which is then dissolved in isopropanol and measured using a spectrophotometer. The number of viable cells is directly proportional to the optical density.

 

Reference Standards

▪ iso 10993-5:2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.

▪ ISO 10993-12:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials.

▪ GB/T 16886.5-2017 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.

 

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Testing of Medical Devices(图2)


Notes

Laboratory testing sampling methods typically involve using extraction fluid for experiments. Suitable extraction ratios are selected based on the characteristics and thickness of the samples according to standards, followed by further sample preparation.

 

Qualitative Cytotoxicity Testing: ISO Qualitative Method

 

Principle

Medical device leachables are cultured with cells, and biological responses of the cells are observed under a microscope. Evaluation of whether cells change is based on cell morphology, vacuole formation, cell detachment, cell lysis, and cell membrane integrity, among other factors, and is then graded accordingly.

 

Reference Standards

▪ iso 10993-5:2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.

▪ GB/T 16886.5-2017 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity.

 

Qualitative Cytotoxicity Testing: USP Qualitative Method

 

Principle

This testing method assesses the impact of leachables from elastic or polymeric materials that come into direct or indirect contact with patients on cell morphology, determining the biological response of the extract.

 

Reference Standard

USP-NF <87>: BIOLOGICAL REACTIVITY TESTS, IN VITRO: Elution Test.


Email:hello@jjrlab.com


Leave Your Message


Write your message here and send it to us


Related News
Read More >>
What is the Difference Between EU PPWR and EPR? What is the Difference Between EU PPWR and EPR?
10 .09.2026
What‘s the difference between EU PPWR and EPR? PPWR regulates packaging materials, while EPR manages...
What is Japanese METI Registration What is Japanese METI Registration
10 .09.2026
Selling electronics on Amazon Japan? Both PSE and METI registration are required. Learn the document...
Exporting to Saudi Arabia Saber Certification: PCo Exporting to Saudi Arabia Saber Certification: PCo
10 .09.2026
Exporting to Saudi Arabia? Master Saber certification. Learn the difference between PCoC for regulat...
How to get a Saudi Arabia MSDS? How to get a Saudi Arabia MSDS?
10 .09.2026
Standard MSDS fails Saudi SABER clearance. Ensure compliance with a bilingual English/Arabic GHS for...
Do I Still Need PPWR Compliance if I Have RoHS? Do I Still Need PPWR Compliance if I Have RoHS?
10 .09.2026
RoHS compliance isn‘t enough for EU packaging! PPWR adds strict mandates on recyclability, EPR, and ...
Amazon Children's Toys Direct Validation Mandatory Amazon Children's Toys Direct Validation Mandatory
10 .09.2026
Amazon‘s toy Direct Validation (DV) starts Sept 2025. Partner with JJR Lab, an approved TIC, for dir...
UL 4200A-2026 Compliance Standard for Button/Coin UL 4200A-2026 Compliance Standard for Button/Coin
10 .09.2026
The US CPSC is evaluating the revised UL 4200A-2026 standard for button/coin cell battery products. ...
Guide to the EN18031 Testing Standard Guide to the EN18031 Testing Standard
10 .08.2026
Discover the complete EN18031 testing standard for IoT devices with JJR. Learn compliance rules for ...

Leave Your Message