EMC China Lab

Why Retest the Device if the 5G Module Already Has CE?

Views :
Update time : 2026-01-31

Is ModULe Certification Not Equivalent to Exemption for the Whole Device?

"My 5G module has clearly passed CE certification—why does the whole device need to be tested again for export to the EU?" This is a soul-searching question for many smart hardware manufacturers!

 

The reality is harsh:

① US fcc: Recognizes module certification; the whole device may be exempt from partial testing

② EU CE: Even if the module is certified, the whole device still requires a full set of tests

Why is there such a difference? Today, we will delve into the different attitudes of the EU and the US toward module certification, and how to efficiently handle CE certification!

 

US FCC: Module Certification = Pass for the Whole Device

The fcc part 15.212 rule clearly stipulates:

① If a radio frequency module (such as 5G/Wi-Fi/Bluetooth modules) has passed FCC certification, and the whole device design does not modify its radio frequency parameters (such as frequency, power, antenna structure), the whole device can directly reference the module certification without repeated testing.

② Exception: If the whole device adds other wireless functions (such as an additional Bluetooth chip), supplementary testing is requiRED.

 

US: Focus on Core Regulatory Points

1. The US certification system is relatively flexible, focusing more on whether products comply with core regulatory indicators. Take FCC (Federal Communications Commission) certification as an example—it mainly focuses on the interference of product radio frequency emissions to wireless communications.

2. If a 5G communication module has passed FCC certification, it means the module meets US requirements on key indicators such as radio frequency emissions. When a product adopts this certified module, the US deems that the risk of core radio frequency interference has been effectively controlled. As long as the product also meets corresponding requirements in other aspects (such as electrical safety, covered by other relevant certifications or standards), repeated testing on the certified module part is unnecessary.

3. While ensuring key safety and performance indicators, it minimizes unnecessary burdens on enterprises and improves market access efficiency.

 

● Advantages:

① Saves certification costs (reduces repeated testing)

② Accelerates time-to-market (no need to re-audit the radio frequency part)

 

EU CE: Module Certification ≠ Exemption for the Whole Device

The eu red directive (2014/53/EU) stipulates:

① Even if the 5G module has passed CE certification, the whole device still needs to undergo complete EMC (Electromagnetic Compatibility) and RF (Radio Frequency) testing.

② Reason: The EU believes that the whole device environment (such as PCB layout, housing material, interference from other circuits) may affect the module's radio frequency performance, which must be re-evaluated.

 

EU: Comprehensive and Systematic Consideration to Ensure Regional Coordination and Uniformity

① The EU CE certification system is extremely complex and rigorous, aiming to ensure the free circulation of products across the entire EU market, while protecting consumer health, safety, and environmental protection. CE certification is not merely about product quality, but focuses more on the basic safety requirements of products.

② Take the CE certification of a product using a 5G communication module as an example. Although the module itself has passed CE certification, when integrated into a new product, the electromagnetic compatibility, safety, and other aspects of the entire product system may change. The EU worries that even if the module passes individual testing, it may cause unexpected interference or safety hazards when working with other components of the new product.

③ For instance, other circuits of the new product may interfere with the 5G module's signal, or the power radiation of the 5G module may change in the new environment, thereby affecting the normal operation of surrounding equipment or posing potential risks to human health. Therefore, to fully ensure the safety and compatibility of the entire product system in the EU market, the EU requires re-testing and certification of the integrated product to ensure that the product as a whole meets the EU's high-standard requirements.

● Pain Points:

① Higher certification costs (the whole device requires full testing)

② Longer cycle (usually an additional 2–4 weeks)

 

Why Is the EU So "Strict"?

● Three Core Reasons

1. Risk of Interference from the Whole Device Environment

○ For example: A metal housing may shield signals, and power circuits may introduce noise. The EU requires ensuring that the final product still complies with standards.

2. The "Overall Compliance" Principle of the RED Directive

○ The EU considers that module + whole device = complete product, which must be evaluated as a whole and cannot rely on separate module certification.

3. Historical Regulatory Differences

○ The US FCC is more inclined toward modular certification, while the EU emphasizes the actual performance of terminal products.

"The FCC certifies the module itself, while the EU regulates the performance of the whole device—this is the fundamental difference!"

 

Data Comparison: FCC vs. CE Module Certification Policies

Comparison Item

US FCC

EU CE (RED Directive)

Does module certification exempt the whole device from testing?

Yes (compliant with FCC Part 15.212)

No (whole device retesting required)

Core Regulations

fcc part 15b/15C

RED Directive 2014/53/EU

Testing Focus

Whether module radio frequency parameters are modified

Whole device emc + RF performance

Typical Certification Cycle

Shortened by referencing modules

Full testing of the whole device (cycle may be extended)

 

How to Address the EU CE "Retesting" Issue?

● Three Efficient Strategies

1. Choose "Pre-certified" Modules

○ Prioritize 5G modules that have passed ce red certification to at least ensure the module itself is compliant and reduce the risk of whole device test failure.

2. Optimize Whole Device Design

○ Avoid fully enclosing the antenna with a metal housing, ensure PCB layout minimizes interference, and lower the probability of test failure.

3. Communicate with Laboratories in Advance

○ Provide the module's CE test report; some laboratories may reduce certain test items as appropriate to save costs.

 

Conclusion

The EU CE "whole device retesting" policy does increase costs, but understanding the logic behind it (ensuring compliance in real-world environments) can help us respond more efficiently. If your product is facing challenges with CE certification, feel free to leave a comment or send a private message. JJR LAB provides professional certification consulting + testing optimization solutions to help you go global smoothly!

 

Have you encountered module compatibility issues during CE certification for your products?


Email:hello@jjrlab.com


Leave Your Message


Write your message here and send it to us


Related News
Read More >>
What is the EN 61326-2-3 Standard? What is the EN 61326-2-3 Standard?
01 .31.2026
EN 61326-2-3 ensures EMC compliance for sensors, transmitters, lab & industrial equipment. JJR o...
Why Do Smart Sockets Need IEC 60884 Certification? Why Do Smart Sockets Need IEC 60884 Certification?
01 .31.2026
Smart sockets need IEC 60884 certification for safety & market ; JJR CNAS/ILAC/ISO17025 labs pro...
Why Retest the Device if the 5G Module Already Has Why Retest the Device if the 5G Module Already Has
01 .31.2026
Even if a 5G module is CE-certified, the whole device needs testing per EU RED; JJR LAB provides ISO...
Overview of IEC 62087 Test Standard Overview of IEC 62087 Test Standard
01 .31.2026
IEC 62087 defines power-consumption tests for TVs, monitors, audio/video devices. JJR Lab (CMS, CNAS...
CISPR 25 Test Standard Compliance Guide CISPR 25 Test Standard Compliance Guide
01 .31.2026
Automakers face EMI in smart vehicles; CISPR 25 & GB/T 18655 ensure CE/RE compliance. JJR Lab (C...
IEC/UL/CSA 62368-1 Electrical Distance Testing IEC/UL/CSA 62368-1 Electrical Distance Testing
01 .31.2026
IEC/UL/CSA 62368-1 electrical distance testing supports global market access. CMS, CNAS, ISO/IEC 170...
Canada Wireless Device IC Certification RSS-210 Te Canada Wireless Device IC Certification RSS-210 Te
01 .30.2026
Canada Wireless Device IC Certification RSS-210 testing by JJR, a CMS, CNAS, ISO/IEC 17025 lab, cove...
FCC Part 15.231 for Wireless Remote Controls and S FCC Part 15.231 for Wireless Remote Controls and S
01 .30.2026
FCC Part 15.231 testing for wireless remotes and sensors, covering RF, EMC, bandwidth and duty cycle...

Leave Your Message